Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

PRMR 2025-2026 Recommendations Spreadsheet

Description

Please complete this short form to comment on the recommendations regarding the inclusion of 24 Measures Under Consideration List measures in Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) programs. Your comments will provide additional feedback to CMS on the measures but will not change the recommendations.

These recommendations are based on the votes of two setting-specific PRMR committees –Hospital and Clinician that convened in January 2026. CMS removed MUC2025-020 Advance Care Planning from consideration for several programs, leading to 11 measure-to-program votes not occurring. Although the Post-Acute Care/Long-Term Care (PAC/LTC) setting appears in the drop‑down menu, there are no PAC/LTC recommendations available for public comment for the 2025–2026 cycle. 

How to Submit a Written Public Comment

  1. Select the measure (ID and title) from the drop-down menu.
  2. Attach additional documents to provide context to your comments, as needed.
  3. To comment on additional measures, please complete a new form for each. 

Please Note

Your name and organization will be displayed alongside your public comment once it is published. There may be a brief delay between the submission of your comment and its appearance online, as all comments undergo a review process to ensure compliance with our community guidelines. 

We appreciate your patience and understanding as we strive to maintain a respectful and engaging environment for everyone

Comment Status
Closed
Comment Period
-
Cycle
2025-2026

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 02/11/2026 - 14:19

Permalink

MUC List Measure
Care Setting
Clinician Committee

Please see attached comments in support of the Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Monitoring and Management

MUC ID

MUC2025-034

Your Name
Hilly Paige Jr
Organization or Affiliation (if applicable)
Family Heart Foundation

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 02/16/2026 - 12:23

Permalink

MUC List Measure
Care Setting
Clinician Committee

Please see the attached letter for our comments on the PRMR Committee Recommendation for the LDL-C Monitoring and Management (MUC2025-034) measure.

Your Name
Stefanie Wiegand
Organization or Affiliation (if applicable)
Amgen Inc.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 02/16/2026 - 17:09

Permalink

MUC List Measure

Patients for Patient Safety US (PFPS US) submits this comment in support of MUC2025-042 (Rate of Timely Follow-up on Abnormal Screening Mammograms for Breast Cancer Detection) and urges CMS to include it in the Proposed Rule for FY2027 to solicit further comment.  Though it did not reach the consensus threshhold vote in the Partnership for Quality Measurement Committee review process, the majority of Committee members supported it.  PFPS US therefore believes this eCQM deserves further consideration.  Currently the MIPS program does not have any related measures that examine timely follow-up for abnormal breast screening mammograms. This measure fills an important gap, given the potential to significantly reduce harm and death. Breast cancer is the second most common cause of cancer deaths among women in the United States. In 2025, around 42,170 women will die from breast cancer, and an estimated 316,950 new cases of invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed.  Breast cancer survival is dependent upon cancer stage at diagnosis. Approximately 99% of women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer live for 5 years or more. However, survival is only about 32% for those diagnosed at the most advanced stage.  

Your Name
Martin Hatlie
Organization or Affiliation (if applicable)
Patients for Patient Safety US

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 02/16/2026 - 17:18

Permalink

MUC List Measure

Patients for Patient Safety US (PFPS US) urges CMS to include MUC2025-043 (Rate of Timely Follow-up on Positive Stool-based Tests for Colorectal Cancer Detection) in its Proposed Rule for FY 2027.  While this eCQM measure failed to reach the consensus threshold in the Partnership for Quality Measure review committee vote, the majority of members voted in favor.  Given the potential of the measure to significantly reduce death and harm, PFPS US believes it deserves consideration and expanded opportunity for public comment in the Proposed Rule. Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States for men and women combined.  In 2025, around 107,320 patients will be diagnosed with colorectal cancer and 53,010 are expected to die from it. Early detection and removal of colorectal polyps and early-stage cancers prevents disease progression and improves the odds of survival. Currently there are no related measures that examine timely follow-up for positive stool-based colorectal screening tests; therefore, this measure fills an important gap.  It also furthers CMS's eCQM strategy, which PFPS US strongly supports.

Your Name
Martin Hatlie
Organization or Affiliation (if applicable)
Patients for Patient Safety US

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 02/16/2026 - 20:02

Permalink

MUC List Measure
Care Setting
Hospital Committee

Patients for Patient Safety US (PFPS US) supports this modernized VTE measure, thinks it belongs in the HAC reduction program, thinks it will reduce preventable harm or death if implemented, and thanks CMS for including it in this year's MUC list. As a digital measure leveraging EHR data, this outcome measure adds no additional time burden and would serve as a complement to PSI-12 which relies on claims data limited to Medicare fee-for-service patients and diagnosis codes. We believe that implementing this measure will incentivize hospitals to take steps to use well-established, evidence-based strategies to reduce incidence of VTEs and improve patient outcomes. We note that it has been submitted for endorsement, one of the reasons cited for the Hospital Committee's failure to recomend it.  We urge CMS to resubmit it as expeditiously after endorsement as feasible. CMS cites that during 2019, 2021, and 2022, patients in the United States experienced 51,586 perioperative VTEs. There is clearly room for improvement by incentivizing more hospitals to follow evidence-based best practices.

Your Name
Martin Hatlie
Organization or Affiliation (if applicable)
Patients for Patient Safety US