Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS)

Adult Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Surgery: No Return to the Operating Room Within 90 Days of Surgery

CMS Measures Inventory Tool (CMIT) ID
00031-01-C-MIPS
Steward Organization Group
American Academy of Ophthalmology
Committee
MSR Recommendation Group
    Measure Overview
      Use in CMS Programs
      CMS Program History
      • Finalized through rulemaking for inclusion in the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) in 2016. 
      • Implemented in MIPS starting with Performance Year (PY) 2017. 
      Description

      Patients aged 18 years and older who had surgery for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment who did not require a return to the operating room within 90 days of surgery.

      Numerator

      Patients who did not return to the operating room within 90 days for complications within the operative eye.

      Numerator Exclusions

      N/A

      Numerator Exceptions

      N/A

      Denominator

      Patients aged 18 years or older who had surgery for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

      Denominator Exclusions

      Surgical procedures that included the use of silicone oil.

      Denominator Exceptions

      N/A

      Cascade of Meaningful Measures Priority
      Measure Type
      Outcome
      Level of Analysis
      Clinician: Group/Practice
      Clinician: Individual
      Care Setting
      Ambulatory Care: Clinician Office
      CBE Endorsement Status
      Not Endorsed
      CBE Endorsement History

      N/A

        About this Analysis (Measure Score by PY)

        Impact Summary: This measure supports the Merit‑based Incentive Payment System by assessing short‑term surgical outcomes for adults undergoing primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery, specifically the absence of a return to the operating room within 90 days of the initial procedure. 

        Performance on this measure is consistently high, with most clinicians achieving rates above 90% and a substantial proportion achieving 100%. 

        Based on the most recent benchmark data, if clinicians in Deciles 1 through 7 improved to the average performance observed in Decile 8 (100%), the percentage of patients with no return to the operating room within 90 days of surgery could increase by about 5 percentage points, from 94.7% to nearly 100%, potentially improving patient outcomes.

        For this measure, Battelle reviewed the following publicly available datasets at Benchmarks - QPP:

        • 2026 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv (referred to as year 2024 in this assessment)
        • 2025 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv (referred to as year 2023 in this assessment)
        • 2024 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv (referred to as year 2022 in this assessment)
        • 2023 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv (referred to as year 2021 in this assessment)

        Battelle analyzed benchmark values for “Measure_ID”=384.

         

        About Figure 1: Figure 1 is a boxplot that shows how rates have changed based on the most recent 4 years of data available. For each year, the boxplot displays a box with lines and dots to help visualize the range and distribution of rates. The dots represent the minimum and maximum rates, and the line connecting them shows the range of the rates. The box itself covers the middle 60% of the rates, from the 20th to the 80th percentile. A “+” sign shows the average rate. This type of graph makes overall trends in rates over time as well as the consistency and spread of the results easier to visualize.

        Figure 1 (Measure Score by PY)
        boxplot

        Figure 1. Boxplot of Performance Rate by Year

        Interpretation (Measure Score by PY)

        Figure 1 Interpretation: For each of the 4 years, at least 20% of clinicians have a 100% performance rate and, except for 2022, at least 80% of the clinicians have a performance rate greater than 90%. For this measure, a higher performance rate indicates better quality of care. 


         

        About this Analysis (Score Distro)

        About Table 1: Table 1 illustrates the distribution of rates across deciles in the most recent data available. 

        Table 1 (Score Distro)

        Table 1. Importance (Decile by Performance Rate, FY2024)

         MeanDecile 1Decile 2Decile 3Decile 4Decile 5Decile 6Decile 7Decile 8Decile 9Decile 10
        Rate94.771.4-87.187.1-91.992.0-93.393.3-94.794.7-96.796.7-97.197.1-100100100100
        Interpretation (Score Distro)

        Table 1 Interpretation: Nearly all clinicians have a rate greater than 80%, more than 80% of clinicians have a rate greater than 90%, and more than 30% of the clinicians have a performance rate of 100%. If the average performance of Decile 8 (100%) is considered a plausible, achievable rate, and the clinicians in Deciles 1 through 7 improved to reach that rate, the estimated percentage of patients with no return to the operating room within 90 days of surgery would go up by about 5% (from 94.7% to nearly 100%), potentially leading to better health outcomes for these patients.

          Importance Criterion Definition

          The Meaningfulness criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September.  

            Criterion Definition

            This criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September.  

              Criterion Definition

              This criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September.  

              PA Type
              Performance and Impact Analysis (PIA)

              Advance Care Planning (ACP)

              Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older at the start of the measurement period with one or more inpatient encounters during the measurement period who have an advance care planning document or documentation of an advance care planning discussion resulting in a documented decision in the electronic health record (EHR) by the time of hospital discharge for at least one hospital encounter during the measurement period.  

              Appropriate Assessment of Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filters for Removal

              CMS Measures Inventory Tool (CMIT) ID
              00068-01-C-MIPS
              Steward Organization Group
              Society of Interventional Radiology
              Committee
              MSR Recommendation Group
                Measure Overview
                  Use in CMS Programs
                  CMS Program History
                  • Finalized through rulemaking for inclusion in the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) in 2016. 
                  • Implemented in MIPS starting with Performance Year (PY) 2017.
                  Description

                  Percentage of patients in whom a retrievable IVC filter is placed who, within 3 months post-placement, have a documented assessment for the appropriateness of continued filtration, device removal or the inability to contact the patient with at least two attempts.

                  Numerator

                  Number of patients that have appropriate IVC filter follow-up.

                  Numerator Exclusions

                  N/A

                  Numerator Exceptions

                  N/A

                  Denominator

                  All patients who have a retrievable IVC filter placed with the intent for potential removal at time of placement.

                  Denominator Exclusions

                  None

                  Denominator Exceptions

                  N/A

                  Cascade of Meaningful Measures Priority
                  Measure Type
                  Process
                  Level of Analysis
                  Clinician: Group/Practice
                  Clinician: Individual
                  Care Setting
                  Ambulatory Surgery Center
                  Hospital: Outpatient
                  CBE Endorsement Status
                  Not Endorsed
                  CBE Endorsement History

                  N/A

                    About this Analysis (Measure Score by PY)

                    Impact Summary: This measure supports the Merit‑based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) by promoting appropriate follow‑up assessment for patients who receive retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters, a process intended to support safe device management and timely removal when clinically appropriate. 

                    Due to low reporting on this measure, no benchmark data are currently available in the publicly reported MIPS Quality Benchmarks files reviewed for this assessment. As a result, performance trends and the potential impact of improvement on patient outcomes cannot be evaluated at this time. The absence of benchmark data limits the ability to assess the importance or impact of this measure within MIPS. The measure is included in the Interventional Radiology MIPS Value Pathway (MVP), which may help increase adoption and reporting in the future.

                    For this measure, Battelle reviewed the following publicly available datasets at Benchmarks - QPP:

                    • 2026 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv 
                    • 2025 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv 
                    • 2024 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv 
                    • 2023 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv

                    There are no benchmark values for “Measure_ID”=421 in these files, and therefore no data are available to assess this measure. During these years, CMS did not receive sufficient data submissions to establish a performance period benchmark.

                      Importance Criterion Definition

                      The Meaningfulness criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September.  

                        Criterion Definition

                        This criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September. 

                          Criterion Definition

                          This criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September. 

                          Barrett’s Esophagus

                          CMS Measures Inventory Tool (CMIT) ID
                          00087-01-C-MIPS
                          Steward Organization Group
                          College of American Pathologists
                          Committee
                          MSR Recommendation Group
                            Measure Overview
                              Use in CMS Programs
                              CMS Program History
                              • Finalized through rulemaking for inclusion in the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) in 2016. 
                              • Implemented in MIPS starting with Performance Year (PY) 2017. 
                              Description

                              Percentage of esophageal biopsy reports that document the presence of Barrett’s mucosa that also include a statement about dysplasia.

                              Numerator

                              Esophageal biopsy report documents the presence of Barrett’s mucosa and includes a statement about dysplasia.

                              Numerator Exclusions

                              N/A

                              Numerator Exceptions

                              N/A

                              Denominator

                              All surgical pathology esophageal biopsy reports for Barrett’s Esophagus.

                              Denominator Exclusions

                              None. 

                              Denominator Exceptions

                              N/A

                              Cascade of Meaningful Measures Priority
                              Measure Type
                              Process
                              Level of Analysis
                              Clinician: Group/Practice
                              Clinician: Individual
                              Care Setting
                              Hospital: Outpatient
                              Laboratory
                              CBE Endorsement Status
                              Not Endorsed
                              CBE Endorsement History

                              N/A

                                About this Analysis (Measure Score by PY)

                                Impact Summary: This measure evaluates documentation quality for esophageal biopsy reports in the Merit‑based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) by assessing whether reports that identify Barrett’s mucosa also include a statement regarding dysplasia. As a process measure, it supports MIPS goals by encouraging complete and standardized pathology reporting, which contributes to accurate diagnosis and informed clinical management. This measure is subject to the 7-point Cap Removal Benchmark and represents one of the few measures applicable for pathologists within the MIPS set. 

                                Performance has been uniformly high since implementation, with benchmark data indicating that in 2021 and 2022 all reporting clinicians achieved rates greater than 95%. In 2023 and 2024, mean performance remained high, while the distribution of performance rates has widened, with a subset of clinicians reporting rates below 90%. 

                                For this measure, Battelle reviewed the following publicly available datasets at Benchmarks - QPP:

                                • 2026 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv (referred to as year 2024 in this assessment)
                                • 2025 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv (referred to as year 2023 in this assessment)
                                • 2024 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv (referred to as year 2022 in this assessment)
                                • 2023 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv (referred to as year 2021 in this assessment)

                                Battelle analyzed benchmark values for “Measure_ID”=249 and “Collection Type”= MIPS CQM.

                                 

                                About Figure 1: Figure 1 is a boxplot that shows how rates have changed based on the most recent 4 years of data available. For each year, the boxplot displays a box with lines and dots to help visualize the range and distribution of rates. The dots represent the minimum and maximum rates, and the line connecting them shows the range of the rates. The box itself covers the middle 60% of the rates, from the 20th to the 80th percentile. A “+” sign shows the average rate. This type of graph makes overall trends in rates over time as well as the consistency and spread of the results easier to visualize.

                                Figure 1 (Measure Score by PY)
                                boxplot

                                Figure 1. Boxplot of Performance Rate by Year

                                Interpretation (Measure Score by PY)

                                Figure 1 Interpretation: In 2021 and 2022, all clinicians had a rate higher than 95%; however, in 2023 and 2024, more than 20% of clinicians had a rate less than 90%. Based on information within the benchmark files, it is not possible to determine if this decrease is due to greater variation from more clinicians reporting on the measure in later years or if rates decreased over time within the same clinician population. For this measure, a higher rate indicates better quality of care. 


                                 

                                About this Analysis (Score Distro)

                                About Table 1: Table 1 illustrates the distribution of rates across deciles in the most recent year of data available.

                                Table 1 (Score Distro)

                                Table 1. Importance (Decile by Performance Rate, FY2024) 

                                 

                                Mean

                                Decile 1

                                Decile 2

                                Decile 3

                                Decile 4

                                Decile 5

                                Decile 6

                                Decile 7

                                Decile 8

                                Decile 9

                                Decile 10

                                Rate99.584.0-86.086.0-88.088.0-90.090.0-92.092.0-94.094.0-96.096.0-98.098.0-99.099.0-100100
                                Interpretation (Score Distro)

                                Table 1 Interpretation: Nearly all clinicians have a performance rate greater than 85%, more than 70% of clinicians have a performance rate greater than 90%, and more than 10% of the clinicians have a performance rate of 100%.

                                  Importance Criterion Definition

                                  The Meaningfulness criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September. 

                                    Criterion Definition

                                    This criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September. 

                                      Criterion Definition

                                      This criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September. 

                                      PA Type
                                      Performance and Impact Analysis (PIA)

                                      Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Postoperative Renal Failure

                                      CMS Measures Inventory Tool (CMIT) ID
                                      00172-01-C-MIPS
                                      Steward Organization Group
                                      Society of Thoracic Surgeons
                                      Committee
                                      MSR Recommendation Group
                                        Measure Overview
                                          Use in CMS Programs
                                          CMS Program History
                                          • Finalized through rulemaking for inclusion in the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) in 2016.
                                          • Implemented in MIPS starting with Performance Year (PY) 2017.
                                          Description

                                          Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery (without pre-existing renal failure) who develop postoperative renal failure or require dialysis.

                                          Numerator

                                          Patients who develop postoperative renal failure or require dialysis.

                                          Numerator Exclusions

                                          N/A

                                          Numerator Exceptions

                                          N/A

                                          Denominator

                                          All patients undergoing isolated CABG surgery.

                                          Denominator Exclusions

                                          Documented history of renal failure or baseline serum creatinine >= 4.0 mg/dL; renal transplant recipients are not considered to have preoperative renal failure, unless, since transplantation the Cr has been or is 4.0 or higher.

                                          Denominator Exceptions

                                          N/A

                                          Cascade of Meaningful Measures Priority
                                          Measure Type
                                          Outcome
                                          Level of Analysis
                                          Clinician: Group/Practice
                                          Clinician: Individual
                                          Care Setting
                                          Hospital: Inpatient Acute Care Facility
                                          CBE Endorsement Status
                                          Endorsement Removed
                                          CBE Endorsement History
                                          • This measure was initially endorsed in 2007
                                          • The measure retained endorsement during maintenance in 2019
                                          • Endorsement was removed in 2025

                                          Link to endorsement measure record: Risk-Adjusted Postoperative Renal Failure

                                            About this Analysis (Measure Score by PY)

                                            Impact Summary: This measure supports the Merit‑based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) by assessing the occurrence of postoperative renal failure or dialysis among patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery, an outcome associated with serious postoperative complications and patient safety. 

                                            Due to low reporting on this measure, no benchmark data are currently available in the publicly reported MIPS Quality Benchmarks files reviewed for this assessment. As a result, Battelle cannot evaluate performance trends and the potential impact of improvement on patient outcomes at this time. The absence of benchmark data limits the ability to assess the importance or impact of this measure within MIPS. This measure is in the Surgical MIPS Value Pathway (MVP), which should encourage greater adoption and reporting in the future.

                                            For this measure, Battelle reviewed the following publicly available datasets at Benchmarks - QPP:

                                            • 2026 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv 
                                            • 2025 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv 
                                            • 2024 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv 
                                            • 2023 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv 

                                               

                                            There are no benchmark values for “Measure_ID”=167 in these files, and therefore no data are available to assess this measure. For these years, there has been an insufficient volume of data submitted to establish a performance period benchmark.

                                              Importance Criterion Definition

                                              The Meaningfulness criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September.  

                                                Criterion Definition

                                                This criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September.  

                                                  Criterion Definition

                                                  This criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September.  

                                                  PA Type
                                                  Performance and Impact Analysis (PIA)

                                                  Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Surgical Re-Exploration

                                                  CMS Measures Inventory Tool (CMIT) ID
                                                  00175-01-C-MIPS
                                                  Steward Organization Group
                                                  Society of Thoracic Surgeons
                                                  Committee
                                                  MSR Recommendation Group
                                                    Measure Overview
                                                      Use in CMS Programs
                                                      CMS Program History
                                                      • Finalized through rulemaking for inclusion in Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) in 2016.
                                                      • Implemented in MIPS starting with Performance Year (PY) 2017. 
                                                      Description

                                                      Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery who require a return to the operating room (OR) for mediastinal bleeding with or without tamponade, unplanned coronary artery intervention (native vessel, graft or both), valve dysfunction, aortic reintervention or other cardiac reason during the current hospitalization.

                                                      Numerator

                                                      Patients undergoing isolated CABG surgery who require a return to the OR for mediastinal bleeding with or without tamponade, unplanned coronary artery intervention (native vessel, graft or both), valve dysfunction, aortic reintervention or other cardiac reason during the current hospitalization.

                                                      Numerator Exclusions

                                                      N/A

                                                      Numerator Exceptions

                                                      N/A

                                                      Denominator

                                                      All patients undergoing isolated CABG surgery.

                                                      Denominator Exclusions

                                                      None

                                                      Denominator Exceptions

                                                      N/A

                                                      Cascade of Meaningful Measures Priority
                                                      Measure Type
                                                      Outcome
                                                      Level of Analysis
                                                      Clinician: Group/Practice
                                                      Clinician: Individual
                                                      Care Setting
                                                      Hospital: Inpatient Acute Care Facility
                                                      CBE Endorsement Status
                                                      Endorsement Removed
                                                      CBE Endorsement History
                                                      • This measure was initially endorsed in 2007
                                                      • The measure retained endorsement during maintenance in 2018
                                                      • Endorsement was removed in 2025

                                                      Link to endorsement measure record: Risk-Adjusted Surgical Re-exploration

                                                        About this Analysis (Measure Score by PY)

                                                        Impact Summary: This measure supports the Merit‑based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) by assessing the occurrence of surgical re‑exploration during hospitalization among patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery, an outcome associated with serious postoperative complications and patient safety. 

                                                        Due to low reporting on this measure, no benchmark data are currently available in the publicly reported MIPS Quality Benchmarks files Battelle reviewed for this assessment. As a result, Battelle cannot evaluate performance trends and the potential impact of improvement on patient outcomes at this time. The absence of benchmark data limits the ability to assess the importance or impact of this measure within MIPS. This measure is in the Surgical Care MIPS Value Pathway (MVP), which should increase adoption and reporting in the future.

                                                        For this measure, Battelle reviewed the following publicly available datasets at Benchmarks - QPP:

                                                        • 2026 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv 
                                                        • 2025 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv 
                                                        • 2024 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv 
                                                        • 2023 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv 

                                                           

                                                        There are no benchmark values for “Measure_ID”=168 in these files, and therefore no data are available to assess. For these years, there has been an insufficient volume of data submitted to establish a performance period benchmark.

                                                          Importance Criterion Definition

                                                          The Meaningfulness criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September. 

                                                            Criterion Definition

                                                            This criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September.  

                                                              Criterion Definition

                                                              This criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September.  

                                                              PA Type
                                                              Performance and Impact Analysis (PIA)

                                                              Documentation of Current Medications in the Medical Record

                                                              CMS Measures Inventory Tool (CMIT) ID
                                                              00219-03-E-MIPS
                                                              Steward Organization Group
                                                              Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
                                                              Committee
                                                              MSR Recommendation Group
                                                                Measure Overview
                                                                  Use in CMS Programs
                                                                  CMS Program History
                                                                  • Finalized through rulemaking for inclusion in the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) in 2016.
                                                                  • Implemented in MIPS starting with Performance Year (PY) 2017.
                                                                  Description

                                                                  Percentage of visits for which the eligible clinician attests to documenting a list of current medications using all immediate resources available on the date of the encounter.

                                                                  Numerator

                                                                  Eligible clinician attests to documenting, updating, or reviewing the patient's current medications using all immediate resources available on the date of the encounter.

                                                                  Numerator Exclusions

                                                                  N/A

                                                                  Numerator Exceptions

                                                                  N/A

                                                                  Denominator

                                                                  All visits occurring during the 12-month measurement period.

                                                                  Denominator Exclusions

                                                                  None

                                                                  Denominator Exceptions

                                                                  N/A

                                                                  Cascade of Meaningful Measures Priority
                                                                  Measure Type
                                                                  Process
                                                                  Level of Analysis
                                                                  Clinician: Group/Practice
                                                                  Clinician: Individual
                                                                  Care Setting
                                                                  Hospital: Outpatient
                                                                  CBE Endorsement Status
                                                                  Endorsed
                                                                  CBE Endorsement History
                                                                  • Initial endorsement, 2008
                                                                  • Measure retired and endorsement removed, Patient Safety, Spring Cycle 2020

                                                                  Link to Endorsement Measure Record: Documentation of Current Medications in the Medical Record

                                                                    About this Analysis (Measure Score by PY)

                                                                    Impact Summary: This measure supports the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) goals of improving the quality and safety of care for patients and promoting higher-value care by ensuring clinicians document a current and complete medication list at each visit, which supports accurate clinical decision-making and helps reduce preventable medication errors and adverse drug events. 

                                                                    For the eCQM for this measure, clinician performance remained unchanged from 2021 to 2024, showing consistent documentation of a complete patient medication list. Outliers in clinician performance at the low end of the performance range shown in Figure 1 indicate that some clinicians continue to perform at lower levels and suggest there are still opportunities for improvement. The eCQM identified a medication documentation rate of 99% as achievable; improving performance among lower-scoring clinicians could help ensure 12% more patients have documentation of current medications in their medical record, potentially leading to better health outcomes.

                                                                    For this measure, Battelle reviewed the following publicly available datasets at Benchmarks - QPP:

                                                                    • 2026 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv (referred to as year 2024 in this assessment)
                                                                    • 2025 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv (referred to as year 2023 in this assessment)
                                                                    • 2024 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv (referred to as year 2022 in this assessment)
                                                                    • 2023 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv (referred to as year 2021 in this assessment)

                                                                    Battelle analyzed benchmark values for “Measure_ID”=130 and “CMS eCQM ID”=CMS68v15 to generate eCQM benchmark data.

                                                                    About Figure 1: Figure 1 is a boxplot that shows how rates have changed based on the most recent 4 years of data available. For each year, the boxplot displays a box with lines and dots to help visualize the range and distribution of rates. The dots represent the minimum and maximum rates, and the line connecting them shows the range of the rates. The box itself covers the middle 60% of the rates, from the 20th to the 80th percentile. A “+” sign shows the average rate. This type of graph makes overall trends in rates over time as well as the consistency and spread of the results easier to visualize.

                                                                    Figure 1 (Measure Score by PY)
                                                                    boxplot

                                                                    Figure 1. Boxplot of Performance Rate by Year

                                                                    Interpretation (Measure Score by PY)

                                                                    Figure 1 Interpretation: Performance is virtually unchanged across the 4 years. Each year, there are some clinicians with very low performance, but the 20th percentile has consistently been about 80%. For this measure, a higher rate indicates better quality of care. 


                                                                     

                                                                    About this Analysis (Score Distro)

                                                                    About Table 1: Table 1 illustrates the distribution of performance rates across deciles in the most recent year of data available. 

                                                                    Table 1 (Score Distro)

                                                                    Table 1. Importance (Decile by Performance Rate, 2024) 

                                                                     

                                                                    Mean

                                                                    Decile 1

                                                                    Decile 2

                                                                    Decile 3

                                                                    Decile 4

                                                                    Decile 5

                                                                    Decile 6

                                                                    Decile 7

                                                                    Decile 8

                                                                    Decile 9

                                                                    Decile 10

                                                                    Rate

                                                                    87.1

                                                                    2.9-61.0

                                                                    61.0-80.4

                                                                    80.5-89.0

                                                                    89.0-93.3

                                                                    93.3-96.0

                                                                    96.0-97.8

                                                                    97.8-98.9

                                                                     98.9-99.6

                                                                    99.7-100

                                                                    100



                                                                     

                                                                    Interpretation (Score Distro)

                                                                    Table 1 Interpretation: More than 50% of clinicians have a performance rate greater than 95%, and more than 10% of clinicians have a rate of 100%. If the average performance of Decile 8 (about 99%) is considered a plausible, achievable performance rate, and the clinicians in Deciles 1 through 7 improved to reach that rate, the estimated percentage of patients with documentation of current medications in their medical record would go up by about 12% (from 87.1% to about 99%), potentially leading to better health outcomes. 

                                                                      Importance Criterion Definition

                                                                      The Meaningfulness criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September.  

                                                                        Criterion Definition

                                                                        This criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September.  

                                                                          Criterion Definition

                                                                          This criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September.  

                                                                          PA Type
                                                                          Performance and Impact Analysis (PIA)

                                                                          Documentation of Current Medications in the Medical Record

                                                                          CMS Measures Inventory Tool (CMIT) ID
                                                                          00219-01-C-MIPS
                                                                          Steward Organization Group
                                                                          Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
                                                                          Committee
                                                                          MSR Recommendation Group
                                                                            Measure Overview
                                                                              Use in CMS Programs
                                                                              CMS Program History
                                                                              • Finalized through rulemaking for inclusion in the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) in 2016.
                                                                              • Implemented in MIPS starting with Performance Year (PY) 2017.
                                                                              Description

                                                                              Percentage of visits for which the eligible clinician attests to documenting a list of current medications using all immediate resources available on the date of the encounter.

                                                                              Numerator

                                                                              Eligible clinician attests to documenting, updating, or reviewing the patient's current medications using all immediate resources available on the date of the encounter.

                                                                              Numerator Exclusions

                                                                              N/A

                                                                              Numerator Exceptions

                                                                              N/A

                                                                              Denominator

                                                                              All visits occurring during the 12-month performance period.

                                                                              Denominator Exclusions

                                                                              None

                                                                              Denominator Exceptions

                                                                              N/A

                                                                              Cascade of Meaningful Measures Priority
                                                                              Measure Type
                                                                              Process
                                                                              Level of Analysis
                                                                              Clinician: Group/Practice
                                                                              Clinician: Individual
                                                                              Care Setting
                                                                              Ambulatory Care: Clinician Office
                                                                              Behavioral Health: Inpatient (e.g., Inpatient Psychiatric Facility)
                                                                              Dialysis Facility
                                                                              Home Health
                                                                              Hospital: Outpatient
                                                                              Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility
                                                                              Nursing Home/Skilled Nursing Facility
                                                                              CBE Endorsement Status
                                                                              Not Endorsed
                                                                              CBE Endorsement History

                                                                              While this clinical quality measure (CQM) has not undergone consensus-based entity (CBE) endorsement, the electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) collection type for this measure has gone through the CBE process and is outlined below. 

                                                                              • Initial endorsement, 2008
                                                                              • Measure retired and endorsement removed, Patient Safety, Spring Cycle 2020

                                                                              Link to endorsement measure record: Documentation of Current Medications in the Medical Record

                                                                                About this Analysis (Measure Score by PY)

                                                                                Impact Summary: This measure supports the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) goals of improving the quality and safety of care for patients and promoting higher-value care by ensuring clinicians document a current and complete medication list at each visit, which supports accurate clinical decision-making and helps reduce preventable medication errors and adverse drug events. 

                                                                                Clinician performance has consistently increased from 2021 to 2024, but highlighted improvement is needed among lower-performing clinicians. The analysis showed that a medication documentation rate of 100% is achievable. Based on the PY 2024 data, only 7.7% of the assessed visits lacked documentation of medications. While performance for this measure in MIPS continues to be high, there continues to be instances of poor performance as seen by Decile 1: 3.65 - 78.37.

                                                                                For this measure, Battelle reviewed the following publicly available datasets at Benchmarks - QPP:

                                                                                • 2026 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv (which is referred to as year 2024 in this assessment)
                                                                                • 2025 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv (which is referred to as year 2023 in this assessment)
                                                                                • 2024 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv (which is referred to as year 2022 in this assessment)
                                                                                • 2023 MIPS Quality Benchmarks.csv (which is referred to as year 2021 in this assessment)

                                                                                Battelle analyzed benchmark values for “Measure_ID”=130 and “CMS eCQM ID”=N/A to generate CQM benchmark data.

                                                                                 

                                                                                About Figure 1: Figure 1 is a boxplot that shows how rates have changed based on the most recent 4 years of data available. For each year, the boxplot displays a box with lines and dots to help visualize the range and distribution of rates. The dots represent the minimum and maximum rates, and the line connecting them shows the range of the rates. The box itself covers the middle 60% of the rates, from the 20th to the 80th percentile. A “+” sign shows the average rate. This type of graph makes overall trends in rates over time as well as the consistency and spread of the results easier to visualize.

                                                                                Figure 1 (Measure Score by PY)
                                                                                boxplot

                                                                                Figure 1. Boxplot of Performance Rate by Year

                                                                                Interpretation (Measure Score by PY)

                                                                                Figure 1 Interpretation: Although each year there are some clinicians with very low performance, the 20th percentile has consistently increased from 87.26% in 2021 to 96.34% in 2024. For this measure, a higher rate indicates better quality of care. 


                                                                                 

                                                                                About this Analysis (Score Distro)

                                                                                About Table 1: Table 1 illustrates the distribution of rates across deciles for the most recent year with data available. 

                                                                                Table 1 (Score Distro)

                                                                                Table 1. Importance (Decile by Performance Rate, 2024) 

                                                                                 MeanDecile 1Decile 2Decile 3Decile 4Decile 5Decile 6Decile 7Decile 8Decile 9Decile 10
                                                                                Performance Rate

                                                                                92.3

                                                                                3.7-78.4

                                                                                78.4-96.3

                                                                                96.3-99.5

                                                                                99.5-100

                                                                                100

                                                                                100

                                                                                100

                                                                                100

                                                                                100

                                                                                100



                                                                                 

                                                                                Interpretation (Score Distro)

                                                                                Table 1 Interpretation: More than 80% of clinicians have a performance rate greater than 95%, and more than 60% of clinicians have a rate of 100%. If Decile 8 performance (100%) is used as a plausible, achievable benchmark, and clinicians in Deciles 1 through 4 improved to that level, the estimated percentage of visits with current medications documented in the medical record would increase by about 7.7% (from 92.3% to 100%), potentially leading to better health outcomes for patients.

                                                                                  Importance Criterion Definition

                                                                                  The Meaningfulness criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September.  

                                                                                    Criterion Definition

                                                                                    This criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September. 

                                                                                      Criterion Definition

                                                                                      This criterion will be evaluated as part of the full Preliminary Assessment available in September. 

                                                                                      PA Type
                                                                                      Performance and Impact Analysis (PIA)